ZP THE WORLD BEYOND THE HORIZON
  • Home
    • About me ♦ Acerca de mim
    • Billboard archive ♦ Arquivo Jornal de parede
    • Visitor feedback ♦ Opinião do visitante ♦ Subscribe ♦ Subscreve
    • Forum ♦ Foro
    • Links
  • Photography ♦ Fotografia
    • Photo Galleries >
      • Portraits
      • Still life
      • Citizens from the lonely city
      • On the road
      • Sun Beam
      • Incógnitos
      • Objects
      • Mates & Fates
      • Altered Landscapes
      • Wildlife - Birds
      • World Landscapes
      • The World in Words
      • Textures
      • Urban Landscapes
      • Heart of Darkness
      • Beyond dead
    • Photography Blog
  • Videography ♦ Videografia
    • Video Galleries >
      • On the road
      • Music Forever
      • My Poetry
      • 90'' Photomotion
      • Nature Forever
    • Videography Blog
  • Adventures ♦ Aventuras
    • ZP o astronauta do pedacinho do céu >
      • Blog ZP - Retalhos da vida de um Naturalista
      • Blog ZP - O astronauta do pedacinho do céu
  • Essays ♦ Ensaios
    • Ensaios Blog
  • Poetry ♦ Poesia
    • Poesia Blog
  • Miscellaneous ♦ Miscelâneas
    • Miscelâneas Blog
  • Activismedia
    • Activismedia Blog
  • Favorite Web Articles ♦ Artigos Favoritos Web
  • Geocache Agent ♦ Agente Geocache
    • Geocache Agent ♦ Agente Geocache Blog

Occupy Wall Street activists buy $15m of Americans' personal debt

11/30/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/12/occupy-wall-street-activists-15m-personal-debt
 
By Adam Gabbatt
 
Rolling Jubilee spent $400,000 to purchase debt cheaply from banks before 'abolishing' it, freeing individuals from their bills


"Our primary purpose was to spread information about the workings of this secondary debt market," said Andrew Ross.
  Photograph: Spencer Platt/Getty Images

A group of Occupy Wall Street activists has bought almost $15m of Americans' personal debt over the last year as part of the Rolling Jubilee project to help people pay off their outstanding
credit.
 
Rolling Jubilee, set up by Occupy's Strike Debt group following the street protests that swept the world in 2011, launched on 15 November 2012. The group purchases personal debt cheaply from
banks before "abolishing" it, freeing individuals from their bills.
 
By purchasing the debt at knockdown prices the group has managed to free $14,734,569.87 of personal debt, mainly medical debt, spending only $400,000.
 
"We thought that the ratio would be about 20 to 1," said Andrew Ross, a member of Strike Debt and professor of social and cultural analysis at New York University. He said the team initially
envisaged raising $50,000, which would have enabled it to buy $1m in debt.
 
"In fact we've been able to buy debt a lot more cheaply than that."
 
The group is able to buy debt so cheaply due to the nature of the "secondary debt market". If individuals consistently fail to pay bills from credit cards, loans, or medical insurance the bank or lender that issued the funds will eventually cut its losses by selling that debt to a third party. These sales occur for a fraction of the debt’s true values – typically for five cents on the dollar – and debt-buying companies then attempt to recoup the debt from the individual debtor and thus make a profit.

The Rolling Jubilee project was mostly conceived as a "public education project", Ross said.
 
"We're under no illusions that $15m is just a tiny drop in the secondary debt market. It doesn't make a dent in the amount of debt.
 
"Our purpose in doing this, aside from helping some people along the way – there's certainly many, many people who are very thankful that their debts are abolished – our primary purpose was to  spread information about the workings of this secondary debt market."
 
The group has focussed on buying medical debt, and has acquired the $14.7m in three separate purchases, most recently purchasing the value of $13.5m on medical debt owed by 2,693 people
across 45 states and Puerto Rico, Rolling Jubilee said in a press release.
 
“No one should have to go into debt or bankruptcy because they get sick,” said Laura Hanna, an organiser with the group. Hanna said 62% of all personal bankruptcies have medical debt as a  contributing factor.
 
Due to the nature of the debt market, the group is unable to specify whose debt it purchases, taking on the amounts before it discovers individuals’ identities. When Rolling Jubilee has bought the debt they send notes to their debtors “telling them they’re off the hook”,Ross said.

Ross, whose book, Creditocracy and the case for debt refusal, outlines the problems of the debt industry and calls for a “debtors’movement” to resist credit, said the group had received letters
from people whose debt they had lifted thanking them for the service. But the real victory was in spreading knowledge of the nature of the debt industry, he said.
 
"Very few people know how cheaply their debts have been bought by collectors. It changes the psychology of the debtor, knowing this.
 
“So when you get called up by the debt collector, and you're being asked to pay the full amount of your debt, you now know that the debt collector has bought your debt very, very cheaply. As cheaply as we bought it. And that gives you moral ammunition to have a different conversation with the debt collector."



Occupy Wall Street activists buy $15m of Americans' personal debt .docx
File Size: 52 kb
File Type: docx
Download File

0 Comments

Feeding the Flame of Revolt

11/30/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/feeding_the_flame_of_revolt_20131117/


Posted on Nov 17, 2013

By Chris Hedges





AP/Seth Wenig
Protesters stand in front of the federal courthouse during the arraignment of Jeremy Hammond in Manhattan on May 14, 2012. 

 
NEW YORK—I was in federal court here Friday for the sentencing of
Jeremy Hammond to 10 years in prison for hacking into the computers of a private security firm that works on behalf of the government, including the Department of Homeland Security, and corporations such as Dow
Chemical. In 2011 Hammond, now 28, released to the website WikiLeaks and Rolling
Stone and other publications some 3 million emails from the Texas-based company Strategic Forecasting Inc., or Stratfor.

The sentence was one of the longest in U.S. history for hacking and the maximum the judge could impose under a plea agreement in the case. It was wildly disproportionate to the crime—an act
of nonviolent civil disobedience that championed the public good by exposing abuses of power by the government and a security firm. But the excessive sentence was the point. The corporate state, rapidly losing credibility and legitimacy, is lashing out like a wounded animal. It is frightened. It feels the heat from a rising flame of revolt. It is especially afraid of those such as Hammond who have the technical skills to break down electronic walls and expose the corrupt workings of power.


“People have a right to know what governments and corporations are doing behind closed doors,” Hammond told me when we met in the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan about a week
and a half before his sentencing.

I did not hope for justice from the court. Judge Loretta A. Preska is a member of the right-wing
Federalist Society. And the hack into Stratfor gave the email address and disclosed the password of an account used for business by Preska’s husband, Thomas Kavaler, a partner at the law firm Cahill Gordon & Reindel. Some emails of the firm’s corporate clients, including Merrill Lynch, also were
  exposed. The National Lawyers Guild, because the judge’s husband was a victim of the hack, filed a recusal motion that Preska, as chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, was able to deny. Her refusal to recuse herself allowed her to oversee a trial in which she had a huge conflict of interest.

The judge, who herself once was employed at Cahill Gordon & Reindel, fulminated from the bench about Hammond’s “total lack of respect for the law.” She read a laundry list of his arrests for acts of
civil disobedience. She damned what she called his “unrepentant recidivism.” She said: “These are not the actions of Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela … or even Daniel Ellsberg; there’s nothing high-minded or public-spirited about causing mayhem”—an odd analogy given that Mandela founded the armed wing of the African National Congress, was considered by South Africa’s apartheid
government and the United States government to be a terrorist and was vilified, along with King and Ellsberg, by the U.S. government. She said there was a “desperate need to promote respect for the law” and a “need for adequate public deterrence.” She read from transcripts of Hammond’s conversations in 
Anonymous chat rooms in which he described the goal of hacking into Stratfor as“destroying the target, hoping for bankruptcy, collapse” and called for“maximum mayhem.” She admonished him for releasing the unlisted phone number of a retired Arizona police official who allegedly received threatening phone calls afterward. 

The judge imposed equally harsh measures that will take effect after Hammond’s release from prison. She ordered that he be placed under three years of supervised control, be forbidden
to use encryption or aliases online and submit to random searches of his  computer equipment, person and home by police and any internal security agency without the necessity of a warrant. The judge said he was legally banned from having any contact with“electronic civil disobedience websites or organizations.” By the time she had finished she had shredded all pretense of the rule of law. 

The severe sentence—Hammond will serve more time than the combined sentences of four men
who were convicted in Britain for hacking related to the U.S. case—was monumentally stupid for a judge seeking to protect the interest of the ruling class. The judicial lynching of Hammond required her to demonstrate a callous disregard for transparency and our right to privacy. It required her to
ignore the disturbing information Hammond released showing that the government and Stratfor attempted to link nonviolent dissident groups, including some within Occupy, to terrorist organizations so peaceful dissidents could be prosecuted as terrorists. It required her to accept the frightening fact that intelligence agencies now work on behalf of corporations as well as the state.
She also had to sidestep the fact that Hammond made no financial gain from the leak.

The sentencing converges with the state’s persecution of Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden, Julian Assange and Barrett Brown, along with Glenn Greenwald, Jacob Appelbaum, Laura Poitras and Sarah Harrison, four investigative journalists who are now in self-imposed exile from the United States. And as the numbers of our political prisoners and exiled dissidents mount, there is the unmistakable stench of tyranny. 
 
This draconian sentence, like the draconian sentences of other whistle-blowers, will fan revolt. History bears this out. It will solidify the growing understanding that we must resort, if we
want to effect real change, to unconventional tactics to thwart the mounting abuses by the corporate state. There is no hope, this sentencing shows, for redress from the judicial system, elected officials or the executive branch. Why should we respect a court system, or a governmental system, that shows no respect to us? Why should we abide by laws that serve only to protect criminals
such as Wall Street thieves while leaving the rest of us exposed to abuse? Why should we continue to have faith in structures of power that deny us our most basic rights and civil liberties? Why should we be impoverished so the profits of big banks, corporations and hedge funds can swell? 
 
No one will save us but ourselves. That was the real message sent out by the sentencing of Jeremy
Hammond. And just as Hammond was inspired to act by the arrest of Chelsea (then Bradley) Manning, others will be inspired to act by Hammond and the actions taken against him. And we can thank Judge Preska for that. 
 
Hammond is rooted in the
Black Bloc. As he was escorted out of the courtroom on the ninth floor of the federal courthouse at 500 Pearl St. on Friday he shouted to roughly 100 people—including a class of prim West Point cadets in their blue uniforms—gathered there: “Long live Anonymous! Hurrah for anarchy!” In a statement he read in court he thanked “Free Anons, the Anonymous Solidarity Network [and] Anarchist Black Cross” for their roles in the fight against oppression.

Hammond has abandoned faith not only in traditional institutions, such as the courts, but nonviolent mass protest and civil disobedience, a point on which he and I diverge. But his analysis of corporate tyranny is correct. And the longer the state ruthlessly persecutes dissidents, the more the state ensures that those who oppose it will resort to radical responses including violence. “Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable,” John F. Kennedy said. And the
corporate state is not only making peaceful change impossible but condemning it as terrorism.


In late October I spent an afternoon with Hammond in New York’s Metropolitan Correctional Center, where he had been held for 20 months. He said during our conversation, parts of which his
lawyer requested be published only after his sentencing, that he believed that the sole way the people will now have any power is to rise up physically and seize it. My column last week was about that interview, and now I am including previously withheld parts of the conversation. 
 
Hammond defines himself as “an anarchist communist.” He seeks to destroy capitalism and the centralized power of the corporate state. His revolutionary vision is “leaderless collectives
based on free association, consensus, mutual aid, self-sufficiency and harmony with the environment.” He embraces the classic tools of revolt, including mass protests, general strikes and boycotts. And he sees hacking and leaking as part of this resistance, tools not only to reveal the truths about these systems of corporate power but to “disrupt/destroy these systems entirely.”

He participated in the Occupy movement in Chicago but found the politics of Occupy too vague and amorphous, a point on which I concur. He said Occupy lacked revolutionary vigor. He told me
he did not support what he called the “dogmatic nonviolence doctrine” of many in the Occupy movement, calling it “needlessly limited and divisive.” He rejects the idea of acts of civil disobedience that protesters know will lead to their arrest. “The point,” he said, “is to carry out acts of resistance and not get caught.” He condemns “peace patrols,” units formed within the Occupy movement
that sought to prohibit acts of vandalism and violence by other protesters—most often members of the Black Bloc—as “a secondary police force.” And he spurns the calls by many in Occupy not to antagonize the police, calling the police “the boot boys of the 1 percent, paid to protect the rich and powerful.” He said such a tactic of non-confrontation with the police ignored the long history of
repression the police have carried out against popular movements, as well as the “profiling and imprisonment of our comrades.” 
 
“Because we were unprepared, or perhaps unwilling, to defend our occupations, police and mayors launched coordinated attacks, driving us out of our own parks,” he said of the state’s closure of the Occupy encampments.

“I fully support and have participated in Black Bloc and other forms of militant direct action,” he said.
“I do not believe that the ruling powers listen to the people’s peaceful protests. Black Bloc is an effective, fluid and dynamic form of protest. It causes disruption outside of predictable/controllable mass demonstrations through ‘unarrests,’ holding streets, barricades and property destruction.
Smashing corporate windows is not violence, especially when compared to the everyday economic violence of sweatshops and ‘free trade.’ Black Bloc seeks to hit them where it hurts, through economic damage. But more than smashing windows they seek to break the spell of ‘law and order’ and the artificial limitations we impose on ourselves.”

I disagree with Hammond over tactics, but in the end this disagreement is moot. It will be the ruling elites who finally determine our response. If the corporate elites employ the full force of the security and surveillance state against us, if corporate totalitarian rule is one of naked, escalating and brutal physical repression, then the violence of the state will spawn a counter-violence. Judge Preska’s
decision to judicially lynch Hammond has only added to the fury she and the state are trying to stamp out. An astute ruling class, one aware of the rage rippling across the American landscape, would have released Hammond on Friday and begun to address the crimes he exposed. But our ruling class, while adept at theft, looting, propaganda and repression, is blind to the growing discontent
caused by the power imbalance and economic inequality that plague ordinary Americans at a time when half of the country lives in poverty or “near poverty.”

“The acts of civil disobedience and direct action that I am being sentenced for today are in line
with the principles of community and equality that have guided my life,” Hammond told the courtroom.“I hacked into dozens of high-profile corporations and government institutions, understanding very clearly that what I was doing was against the law, and that my actions could land me back in federal prison. But I felt that I had an obligation to use my skills to expose and confront
injustice—and to bring the truth to light.”

“Could I have achieved the same goals through legal means?” he said. “I have tried everything from voting petitions to peaceful protest and have found that those in power do not want the truth to be exposed. When we speak truth to power we are ignored at best and brutally suppressed at worst. We are confronting a power structure that does not respect its own system of checks and balances, never mind the rights of its own citizens or the international community.”

“My first memories of American politics was when Bush stole the election in 2000,” he told me at a metal table as we met at the prison in a small room reserved for attorney visits, “and then how Bush used the wave of nationalism after 9/11 to launch unprovoked pre-emptive wars against Afghanistan and Iraq. In high school I was involved in publishing‘underground’ newsletters criticizing the Patriot Act, the wars, and other Bush-era policies. I attended many anti-war protests in the city [Chicago]
and was introduced to other local struggles and the larger anti-corporate globalization movement. I began identifying as an anarchist, started to travel around the country to various mobilizations and conferences, and began getting arrested for various acts.”

He said that his experience of street protest, especially against the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, was seminal, for he saw that the state had little interest in heeding the voices of protesters and others in the public. “Instead, we were labeled as traitors, beaten and arrested.”

“I targeted law enforcement systems because of the racism and inequality with which the criminal law is enforced,” he admitted in court. “I targeted the manufacturers and distributors of military and police equipment who profit from weaponry used to advance U.S. political and economic interests abroad and to repress people at home. I targeted information security firms because they work in secret to protect government and corporate interests at the expense of individual rights,
undermining and discrediting activists, journalists and other truth seekers, and spreading disinformation.”

An FBI informant, Hector Xavier Monsegur, posing as an Anonymous member and using the online name “Sabu,” prodded Hammond to break into Stratfor and informed him of technical
vulnerabilities in websites of the company.

“Why the FBI would introduce us to the hacker who found the initial vulnerability and
allow this hack to continue remains a mystery,” Hammond said as he faced the judge.

“As a result of the Stratfor hack, some of the dangers of the unregulated private intelligence industry are now known,” he said. “It has been revealed through WikiLeaks and other journalists around the world that Stratfor maintained a worldwide network of informants that they used to engage in intrusive and possibly illegal surveillance activities on behalf of large multinational corporations.”

At Sabu’s urging, Hammond broke into other websites, too. Hammond, at Sabu’s request, provided information to hackers enabling them to break into and deface official foreign government
websites, including some of Turkey, Iran and Brazil. The names of these three countries are technically under a protective court order but have been reported widely in the press.

“I broke into numerous sites and handed over passwords and backdoors that enabled Sabu—and by extension his FBI handlers—to control these targets,” Hammond said. 
 
“I don’t know how other information I provided to him may have been used, but I think the government’s collection and use of this data needs to be investigated,” he went on. “The
government celebrates my conviction and imprisonment, hoping that it will close the door on the full story. I took responsibility for my actions, by pleading guilty, but when will the government be made to answer for its crimes?”

“The hypocrisy of ‘law and order’ and the injustices caused by capitalism cannot be cured by institutional reform but through civil disobedience and direct action,” Hammond told the court. “Yes, I broke the law, but I believe that sometimes laws must be broken in order to make room for change.”



Feeding the Flame of Revolt - by Chris Hedges.docx
File Size: 57 kb
File Type: docx
Download File

0 Comments

Comunicado: Perseguição ilegal ao lobo-ibérico

11/14/2013

0 Comments

 

http://atnatureza.blogspot.pt/2013/11/comunicado-perseguicao-ilegal-ao-lobo.html

Segunda-feira, 11 de Novembro de  2013
 
O recente caso do abate da loba “Bragadinha” dentro do Parque Nacional da Peneda-Gerês reflecte a impunidade com que se está a matar ilegalmente o lobo-ibérico em Portugal. As organizações subscritoras juntam-se num apelo
público à acção contundente em relação aos crimes contra esta espécie ameaçada e protegida na legislação nacional e internacional. 
  
A  fêmea adulta “Bragadinha” foi encontrada morta a 30 de Outubro de 2013 e os resultados da sua necrópsia foram claros: abatida a tiro de caçadeira e simultaneamente atacada por uma matilha de cães. Este episódio, ocorrido dentro da Zona de Caça Associativa da Gavieira, Arcos de Valdevez, no Parque Nacional da Peneda-Gerês, é o quinto abate ilegal de lobo-ibérico de entre os 15 lobos seguidos por telemetria no Alto Minho. Esta fêmea era uma jovem reprodutora da alcateia existente na área, tendo tido a sua primeira ninhada em Maio deste ano.

O Sistema de Monitorização dos Lobos Mortos, implementado pelo Instituto de Conservação da Natureza e Florestas (ICNF), indica que para os 80 registos de mortes de lobos identificados entre 1999 e 2011, 71% tiveram como causa a acção humana, muitas das vezes em circunstâncias de perseguição ilegal, como por exemplo o tiro, laço e veneno. Dados do CIBIO, obtidos por telemetria no Noroeste de Portugal, revelam que anualmente 45% dos lobos da zona são mortos por acção humana e de forma ilegal. Esta mortandade é insustentável e levará, se não for travada, ao rápido desaparecimento dos 300 exemplares que ainda sobrevivem em Portugal.

Na mesma zona de caça onde foi abatida a loba “Bragadinha”, no ano passado deu-se a morte a tiro de um lobo adulto durante uma batida ao javali. O indivíduo responsável pelo crime foi apenas punido com uma multa de 300€, um valor que se considera irrisório e sem qualquer efeito dissuasor.

O lobo, pelo seu estatuto de protecção, não é espécie cinegética em Portugal e estes abates ilegais com arma de fogo, que nada têm a ver com a caça e com a exploração sustentada dos recursos cinegéticos, não podem continuar a ocorrer. Por esta razão urge sensibilizar e dialogar com as Organizações do Sector da Caça, envolvendo todas as partes no esforço de conservação do lobo, erradicando tais actos criminosos e encontrando formas de mitigação das motivações que estão na sua base.
 
As organizações subscritoras deste comunicado exigem às autoridades competentes, nomeadamente ao ICNF, ao SEPNA/GNR e em especial ao Ministério Público, uma acção urgente e contundente no que diz respeito a estes casos: 
 
- Os ataques dos lobos a animais domésticos, que constituem uma das principais motivações para a perseguição ilegal a este carnívoro, deverão ser minimizados através da eficaz vigilância do gado e indemnizados atempadamente ao abrigo da Lei de Protecção do Lobo-Ibérico;

- Tem de haver um reforço dos meios de fiscalização (existem no total apenas 15 Vigilantes da Natureza no Parque Nacional da Peneda-Gerês, menos de metade do que seria necessário, e sem as armas necessárias para a fiscalização);
 
- Os processos-crime têm de ser julgados exemplarmente – a aplicação de sentenças ligeiras nestes casos é um autêntico incentivo à prossecução da ilegalidade e do crime impune, consumando-se um extermínio que aproxima cada vez mais o lobo-ibérico da extinção.
 
As organizações subscritoras deste apelo compreendem e reconhecem o complexo conflito entre o Homem e a Natureza, em particular o lobo, mas insistem na utilização plena das ferramentas desenvolvidas para mitigar as consequências desta realidade. O reforço destes instrumentos é crucial para a conservação a longo prazo desta e de outras espécies protegidas.
 
Às autoridades públicas competentes cabe promover todas as iniciativas necessárias para inverter a tendência perversa, que conduz à destruição do nosso património natural e cultural. O lobo-ibérico é o expoente máximo da biodiversidade da região, sendo a Peneda-Gerês o único parque nacional do país, razão pela qual é absolutamente inaceitável que se possam reproduzir em anos sucessivos situações de ilegalidade impune como esta.
 
Lisboa, 8 de Novembro de 2013
 
As organizações subscritoras:
ALDEIA – Acção Liberdade, Desenvolvimento, Educação, Investigação, Ambiente
ANPC – Associação Nacional de Proprietários Rurais, Gestão Cinegética e Biodiversidade
APGVN – Associação Portuguesa de Guardas e Vigilantes da Natureza
ASCEL – Asociación para la Conservación y Estudio del Lobo Iberico
Associação Transumância e Natureza
CARNIVORA – Núcleo de Estudos de Carnívoros e seus Ecossistemas
FAPAS – Fundo para a Protecção dos Animais Selvagens
Grupo Lobo – Associação para a Conservação do Lobo e do seu Ecossistema
LPN – Liga para a Protecção da Natureza
Quercus – Associação Nacional de Conservação da Natureza

Comunicado: Perseguição ilegal ao lobo-ibérico.docx
File Size: 45 kb
File Type: docx
Download File

0 Comments

The Revolutionaries in Our Midst

11/14/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture

AP/Cook County Sheriff's Office

Jeremy Hammond in a March 2012 booking photo from the Cook County Sheriff’s Office in Chicago.

Posted on Nov 10, 2013 - By Chris  Hedges



NEW YORK—Jeremy Hammond sat in New York’s Metropolitan Correctional Center last week in a small room reserved for visits from attorneys. He was wearing an oversized prison jumpsuit. The brown hair of the lanky 6-footer fell over his ears, and he had a wispy beard. He spoke with the intensity and clarity one would expect from one of the nation’s most important political prisoners. 
 
On Friday the
28-year-old  activist will appear for sentencing in the Southern District Court of New York in Manhattan. After having made a plea agreement, he faces the possibility of a 10-year sentence for hacking into the Texas-based private security firm Strategic Forecasting Inc., or Stratfor, which does work for the Homeland Security Department, the Marine Corps, the Defense Intelligence Agency and numerous corporations including Dow Chemical and Raytheon.

Four others involved in the hacking have been convicted in Britain, and they were sentenced to less time combined—the longest sentence was 32 months—than the potential 120-month sentence that lies before Hammond.
Hammond turned the pilfered information over to the website WikiLeaks and
Rolling Stone and other publications. The 3 million email exchanges, once made public, exposed the private security firm’s infiltration, monitoring and surveillance of protesters and dissidents, especially in the Occupy movement, on behalf of corporations and the national security state.
And, perhaps most important, the information provided chilling evidence that anti-terrorism laws are being routinely used by the federal government to criminalize nonviolent, democratic dissent and falsely link dissidents to international terrorist organizations. Hammond sought no financial gain.
He got none. 
The email exchanges Hammond made public were entered as evidence in
my lawsuit against President Barack Obama over Section 1021 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Section 1021 permits the military to seize citizens who are deemed by the state to be terrorists, strip them of due process and hold them indefinitely in military facilities. Alexa
O’Brien, a content strategist and journalist who co-founded US Day of Rage, an organization created to reform the election process, was one of my co-plaintiffs. Stratfor officials attempted, we know because of the Hammond leaks, to falsely link her and her organization to Islamic radicals and websites as well as to jihadist ideology, putting her at risk of detention under the new law. Judge Katherine B. Forrest ruled, in part because of the leak, that we plaintiffs had a credible fear, and she nullified the law, a decision that an appellate court overturned when the Obama administration appealed it. 
 
Freedom of the press and legal protection for those who expose government abuses and lies have been obliterated by the corporate state. The resulting self-exile of investigative journalists such as 
Glenn Greenwald, Jacob Appelbaum and Laura Poitras, along with the indictment of Barrett Brown, illustrate this. All acts of resistance — including nonviolent protest — have been conflated by the corporate state with terrorism. The mainstream, commercial press has been emasculated
through the Obama administration’s repeated use of the Espionage Act to charge and sentence traditional whistle-blowers. Governmental officials with a conscience are too frightened to reach out to mainstream reporters, knowing that the authorities’wholesale capturing and storing of electronic forms of communication make them easily identifiable. Elected officials and the courts no longer impose restraint or practice oversight. The last line of defense lies with those such as Hammond, Julian Assange, Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning who are capable of burrowing into the records of the security and surveillance state and have the courage to pass them on to the public. But the price of resistance is high.

“In these times of secrecy and abuse of power there is only one solution—transparency,” wrote
Sarah Harrison, the British journalist who accompanied Snowden to Russia and who also has gone into exile, in Berlin. “If our governments are so compromised that they will not tell us the truth, then we must step forward to grasp it. Provided with the unequivocal proof of primary source documents people can fight back. If our governments will not give this information to us, then we must take it for ourselves.”

“When whistleblowers come forward we need to fight for them, so others will be encouraged,” she went on. “When they are gagged, we must be their voice. When they are hunted, we must be their shield. When they are locked away, we must free them. Giving us the truth is not a crime. This is our data, our information, our history. We must fight to own it. Courage is contagious.”

Hammond knows this contagion. He was living at home in Chicago in 2010 under a 7-a.m.-to-7-p.m. curfew for a
variety of acts of civil disobedience when Chelsea (formerly Bradley) Manning was arrested for giving WikiLeaks secret information about military war crimes and government lies. Hammond at the time was running social aid programs to feed the hungry and send books to prisoners. He had, like Manning, displayed a remarkable aptitude for science, math and computer languages at a young age. He hacked into the computers at a local Apple store at 16. He hacked into the computer science department’s website at the University of Illinois-Chicago as a freshman, a prank that saw the university refuse to allow him to return for his sophomore year. He was an early backer of “cyber-liberation” and in 2004 started an “electronic-disobedience journal” he named Hack This Zine. He called on hackers in a speech at the 2004 DefCon convention in Las Vegas to use their skills to disrupt that year’s Republican National Convention. He was, by the time of his 2012 arrest, one of the shadowy stars of the hacktivist underground, dominated by groups such as Anonymous and WikiLeaks in which anonymity, stringent security and frequent changes of aliases alone ensured success and survival. Manning’s courage prompted Hammond to his own act of cyber civil disobedience, although he knew his chances of being caught were high.

“I saw what Chelsea Manning did,” Hammond said when we spoke last Wednesday, seated at a metal table.
“Through her hacking she became a contender, a world changer. She took tremendous risks to show the ugly truth about war. I asked myself, if she could make that risk shouldn’t I make that risk? Wasn’t it wrong to sit comfortably by, working on the websites of Food Not Bombs, while I had the skills to do something similar? I too could make a difference. It was her courage that prompted me to act.”

Hammond—who has black-inked tattoos on each forearm, one the open-source movement’s symbol known as
the “glider” and the other the shi hexagram from the I Ching—is steeped in radical thought. As a teenager, he swiftly migrated politically from the liberal wing of the Democratic Party to the militancy of the Black Bloc anarchists. He was an avid reader in high school of material put out byCrimethInc, an anarchist collective that publishes anarchist literature and manifestos. He has molded himself after old radicals such as Alexander Berkman and Emma Goldman and black revolutionaries such as George Jackson, Elaine Brown and Assata Shakur, as well as members of the Weather Underground. He said that while he was in Chicago he made numerous trips to Waldheim Cemetery to visit the Haymarket Martyrs Monument, which honors four anarchists who were hanged in 1887 and others who took part in the labor wars. On the 16-foot-high granite monument are the final words of one of the condemned men, August Spies. It reads: “The day will come when our silence will be more powerful than the voice you are throttling today.” Emma Goldman is buried nearby.

Hammond became well known to the government for a variety of acts of civil disobedience over the last decade. These ranged from painting anti-war graffiti on Chicago walls to protesting at the 2004 Republican National Convention in New York to hacking into the right-wing website Protest Warrior, for which he was sentenced to two years in  the Federal Correctional Institute at Greenville, Ill.

He said he is fighting as “an anarchist communist”against “centralized state authority” and “exploitative corporations.” His goal is to build “leaderless collectives based on free association, consensus, mutual aid, self-sufficiency and harmony with the environment.” It is essential, he said, that all of us work to cut our personal ties with capitalism and engage in “mass organizing of protests, strikes and boycotts.”Hacking and leaking, he said, are part of this resistance—“effective
tools to reveal ugly truths of the system.”

Hammond spent months within the Occupy movement in Chicago. He embraced its “leaderless, non-hierarchical structures such as general assemblies and consensus, and occupying public spaces.” But he was highly critical of what he said were the “vague politics” in Occupy that allowed it to include followers of the libertarian Ron Paul, some in the tea party, as well as “reformist liberals and Democrats.” Hammond said he was not interested in any movement that “only wanted a ‘nicer’ form of capitalism and favored legal reforms, not revolution.” He remains rooted in the ethos of the Black Bloc. 

“Being incarcerated has really opened my eyes to the reality of the criminal justice system,” he said, “that it is not a criminal justice system about public safety or rehabilitation, but reaping profits through mass incarceration. There are two kinds of justice—one for the rich and the powerful who get away with the big crimes, then for everyone else, especially people of color and the impoverished. There is no such thing as a fair trial. In over 80 percent of the cases people are pressured to plea out instead of exercising their right to trial, under the threat of lengthier sentences. I believe no satisfactory reforms are possible. We need to close all prisons and release everybody unconditionally.”

He said he hoped his act of resistance would encourage others, just as Manning’s courage had inspired him. He said activists should “know and accept the worst possible repercussion” before carrying out an action and should be “aware of mass counterintelligence/surveillance operations targeting our movements.” An informant posing as a comrade,
Hector Xavier Monsegur, known online as “Sabu,” turned Hammond and his co-defendants in to the FBI. Monsegur stored data retrieved by Hammond on an external server in New York. This tenuous New York connection allowed the government to try Hammond in New York for hacking from his home in Chicago into a private security firm based in Texas. New York is the center of the government’s probes into cyber-warfare; it is where federal authorities apparently wanted Hammond to be investigated and charged. 
 
Hammond said he will continue to resist from within prison. A series of minor infractions, as well as testing positive with other prisoners on his tier for marijuana that had been smuggled into the facility, has resulted in his losing social visits for the next two years and spending“time in the box [solitary confinement].” He is allowed to see journalists, but my request to interview him took two months to be approved. He said prison involves “a lot of boredom.” He plays chess, teaches guitar and helps other prisoners study for their GED. When I saw him, he was working on the statement, a personal manifesto, that he will read in court this week.  

He insisted he did not see himself as different from prisoners, especially poor prisoners of color, who are in for common crimes, especially drug-related crimes. He said most inmates are political prisoners, caged unjustly by a system of totalitarian capitalism that has snuffed out basic opportunities for democratic dissent and economic survival.

“The majority of people in prison did what they had to do to survive,” he said. “Most were poor. They got caught up in the war on drugs, which is how you make money if you are poor. The real reason they get locked in prison for so long is so corporations can continue to make big profits. It is not about justice. I do not draw distinctions between us.”

“Jail is essentially enduring harassment and dehumanizing conditions with frequent lockdowns and shakedowns,” he said. “You have to constantly fight for respect from the guards, sometimes getting yourself thrown in the box. However, I will not change the way I live because I am locked up. I will continue to be defiant, agitating and organizing whenever possible.”

He said resistance must be a way of life. He intends to return to community organizing when he is released, although he said he will work to stay out of prison. “The truth,” he said, “will always come out.” He cautioned activists to be hyper-vigilant and aware that “one mistake can be permanent.” But he added, “Don’t let paranoia or fear deter you from activism. Do the down thing!”

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_revolutionaries_in_our_midst_20131110/

The Revolutionaries in Our Midst - by Chris Hedgesby.docx
File Size: 77 kb
File Type: docx
Download File

0 Comments

    Author

        ZP

     Imagem

    Archives

    April 2019
    April 2018
    December 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012

    Categories

    All
    Declaration Of Rights
    International Media Action
    International Media Action
    International - Media Action
    World Australia
    World - Egypt
    World Portugal
    World Portugal
    World Spain
    World USA
    World USA

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.